
Aquinas' theological approach sees conscience as reason applying God's Natural Law. He divides conscience into two parts: Synderesis—an infallible inner principle from God that directs us toward good and away from evil, like a "moral compass" that always points to the primary precepts (worship God, preserve life, reproduce, educate, live in society); and Conscientia—fallible practical judgment where we apply synderesis to specific situations. This is where mistakes happen. Aquinas says conscience is binding—we must follow it, even if it's wrong (though we're not guilty if we couldn't have known better). Conscience "witnesses, binds, and torments" us through guilt when we disobey.
Aquinas views conscience as reason's application of God's Natural Law to human actions. It's a psychological process grounded in God's design of human nature.
What it is:
The Synderesis Rule
"Do good and avoid evil". This is the fundamental principle that cannot be mistaken or lost from the human mind.
Aquinas identifies five primary precepts that flow from synderesis:
Worship God
Our natural inclination toward the transcendent
Live in an Ordered Society
Our social nature
Reproduce
Our biological drive to continue the species
Educate/Learn
Our intellectual nature
Defend/Preserve Human Life
Our instinct for survival and protection of innocent life
Memory Aid: WORLD
Worship, Ordered society, Reproduction, Learning/Education, Defence of innocent = primary precepts
What it is:
1. Synderesis provides the primary precepts (e.g., "preserve human life")
2. Conscientia applies this to a situation (e.g., "euthanasia ends human life")
3. Conscientia forms a secondary precept (e.g., "euthanasia is wrong")
Example: Euthanasia
Primary precept: "Preserve human life"
Application: Euthanasia ends a human life
Secondary precept: "Euthanasia is wrong"
Aquinas' Key Claim
Conscience is binding—it is always wrong to disobey your conscience, even if it's mistaken.
Invincible Ignorance
Couldn't have known better (not your fault)
Example: You genuinely didn't know the primary precept applied to this situation
Result: Not guilty, not morally blameworthy
Vincible Ignorance
Could have known better but didn't (your fault)
Example: You were too lazy to think carefully, or your conscience was corrupted by bad habits
Result: Guilty and morally blameworthy
Aquinas describes three functions:
Witnesses
Conscience tells us what is right and wrong before we act
Binds
Conscience creates a moral obligation we must follow
Torments
Conscience causes guilt (remorse) when we disobey
Mechanism
Our reason knows the moral law through synderesis. When we act against it, we experience guilt because we deep down know we've done wrong.
Real Goods
Actions that truly fulfill our natural telos (purpose) and align with primary precepts
Apparent Goods
Actions that seem good due to faulty reasoning but are actually bad
Example
Someone might reason that euthanasia is compassionate (apparent good), but it's actually wrong because it violates the primary precept of preserving life (real good).
Respects Human Rationality
Conscience develops through reason and education, not just blind obedience. Allows for moral growth and sophistication.
Accounts for Guilt
Explains why we feel guilty when we do wrong—our reason tells us we've violated God's law.
Biblical Foundation
Rooted in Scripture (Romans 2:15) and Christian tradition. Connects conscience to God's design of human nature.
Flexibility Within Structure
Infallible synderesis provides firm foundation, but conscientia allows for application to complex situations.
Verification Problem
How do we know synderesis is from God and infallible? Can't be empirically verified.
Moral Disagreement
If synderesis is infallible, why do people have different moral intuitions? Why do some people intuit that euthanasia is permissible while others don't?
Cultural Relativity
Conscientia can be corrupted by culture, but Aquinas doesn't fully explain how to distinguish corrupted from correct conscience.
The Bindingness Problem
If conscience is mistaken, why must we still follow it? Seems irrational to follow a wrong judgment.
"The first practical principles... belong to a special natural habit which we call 'synderesis'... Synderesis is said to incite to good, and to murmur at evil, inasmuch as through first principles we proceed to discover, and judge of what we have discovered. Conscience is the application of knowledge to our acts, that we may judge whether they are right or wrong."
Aquinas defines synderesis as the innate habit grasping first principles, and conscience as the application of these principles to judge actions.
"Every conscience, whether right or wrong, whether the issue of right reason or perverted, binds. It binds us in such a way that he who disregards conscience commits sin. The conscience is binding, even when it is mistaken."
Aquinas's controversial claim that conscience always binds, even when mistaken, because following conscience is how we fulfill our duty to God's law.
Synderesis (infallible foundation) + Conscientia (fallible application) = Conscience
Worship, Ordered society, Reproduction, Learning, Defence of innocent = primary precepts
Always directs us to good; can't be lost from the human mind
Can make mistakes due to ignorance, bad habits, culture
Must always be obeyed, even if mistaken (though not blameworthy if invincibly ignorant)
Real goods fulfill our telos; apparent goods seem good due to faulty reasoning
| Component | Description | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Synderesis | Innate habit grasping first principles (do good, avoid evil) | Infallible |
| Primary Precepts | Five natural inclinations (Worship, Order, Reproduce, Learn, Defend) | Infallible |
| Conscientia | Application of principles to specific situations | Fallible |
| Secondary Precepts | Specific moral judgments (e.g., "euthanasia is wrong") | Fallible |
| Conscience | Whole process (synderesis + conscientia) | Binding (must be obeyed) |
| Guilt | Torment when we disobey conscience | Natural result of violating synderesis |