
Globalisation in business ethics is about how companies now operate all over the world, and how that creates new moral problems as well as new opportunities. Globalisation means the integration of economies, laws and companies across the world: production in one country, headquarters in another, customers everywhere. Big firms like Apple, Nike, McDonald's and Amazon design in rich countries but manufacture in poorer ones, where labour and regulation are cheaper. This raises key ethical questions: Are sweatshops and off-shore factories simply providing jobs, or exploiting workers with low pay and poor conditions? Are global firms lifting people out of poverty, or destroying local cultures and the environment? Utilitarians might justify globalisation if it maximises overall happiness (cheaper goods, more jobs), while Kantians criticise it when it uses workers merely as a means to profit, for example in sweatshops.
Globalisation is the process by which economies, industries, markets, cultures, and laws of different countries become interconnected and interdependent.
Companies close factories in richer countries and open them in poorer ones where labour is cheaper.
Positive:
Jobs and investment in developing countries; cheaper products for consumers.
Negative:
Low wages, long hours, unsafe conditions, child labour (sweatshops).
To attract investment, poorer countries may weaken labour or environmental laws, leading to:
Global brands (McDonald's, Starbucks, Netflix) spread a homogeneous global culture, sometimes:
Positive:
Breaking down barriers; easier communication; shared experiences.
Negative:
Erosion of local traditions, languages, and small local businesses.
A single product (like a smartphone or t-shirt) may involve:
This makes it harder to track who is responsible for exploitation or damage.
Sweatshops:
Factories with low pay, long hours, poor safety, sometimes child labour.
Utilitarian Defence:
Kantian Critique:
Christian / Natural Law Critique:
Globalisation often leads to:
Ethically:
Globalisation often shifts power from:
Ethical concerns:
Potential Support:
Potential Criticism:
Concerns:
"Globalisation integrates world economies, laws and companies. This gives multinational corporations enormous power to move production to where labour is cheapest and laws are weakest. The result is that what is good for a business—cheap production and high profits—is not always good ethics, particularly when it comes to sweatshops, environmental damage and the erosion of local cultures."
This captures the tension between economic benefits and ethical costs arising from globalisation.
"Globalisation has fundamentally reshaped the landscape of business ethics. It has expanded the scope of corporate responsibility, demanding greater transparency, accountability and sensitivity to cultural diversity. Businesses can no longer afford to operate with narrow or outdated ethical frameworks. Instead, they must adopt inclusive, globally relevant standards that promote fairness, sustainability and the social wellbeing of people."
This quote emphasises that globalisation forces companies to rethink ethics at a global scale, not just a local or national one.
Goods, people, money, and data move easily across borders, integrating economies and cultures.
Investment in developing countries can lift people out of poverty, but sweatshops and environmental harm are major concerns.
Might defend sweatshops if they raise total happiness, but risk underestimating hidden suffering and long-term harms.
Criticise globalisation when it treats people as tools, not as ends in themselves, violating human dignity and rights.
Companies are expected to uphold decent labour, environmental and human rights standards wherever they operate.
| Potential Ethical Benefits | Potential Ethical Harms |
|---|---|
| Jobs and investment in developing countries | Sweatshops and worker exploitation |
| Cheaper goods for consumers worldwide | Environmental damage and resource depletion |
| Cultural exchange and global communication | Loss of local cultures and small businesses |
| Pressure on companies to follow global ethical standards (e.g. UN Global Compact, fair trade) | Power imbalance: MNCs can override local communities and governments |