Phoelosophy

Globalisation

Topic 4 of 4
Globalisation: Ethical Globalism (People, Planet, Prosperity) vs. Exploitation (Profit Over People)

Summary

Globalisation in business ethics is about how companies now operate all over the world, and how that creates new moral problems as well as new opportunities. Globalisation means the integration of economies, laws and companies across the world: production in one country, headquarters in another, customers everywhere. Big firms like Apple, Nike, McDonald's and Amazon design in rich countries but manufacture in poorer ones, where labour and regulation are cheaper. This raises key ethical questions: Are sweatshops and off-shore factories simply providing jobs, or exploiting workers with low pay and poor conditions? Are global firms lifting people out of poverty, or destroying local cultures and the environment? Utilitarians might justify globalisation if it maximises overall happiness (cheaper goods, more jobs), while Kantians criticise it when it uses workers merely as a means to profit, for example in sweatshops.

Detailed Explanation

What Is Globalisation?

Definition

Globalisation is the process by which economies, industries, markets, cultures, and laws of different countries become interconnected and interdependent.

For Business Ethics, This Means:

  • Multinational corporations (MNCs) operate across many countries.
  • Production, supply chains, and labour can be moved to wherever is cheapest or most efficient.
  • Decisions made in one boardroom can impact workers, communities, and environments on the other side of the world.

Key Features of Globalisation in Business

1. Off-shore Outsourcing and Sweatshops

Companies close factories in richer countries and open them in poorer ones where labour is cheaper.

Positive:

Jobs and investment in developing countries; cheaper products for consumers.

Negative:

Low wages, long hours, unsafe conditions, child labour (sweatshops).

2. Race to the Bottom

To attract investment, poorer countries may weaken labour or environmental laws, leading to:

  • Unsafe factories
  • Environmental damage (pollution, deforestation)
  • Weak enforcement of human rights

3. Cultural Globalisation

Global brands (McDonald's, Starbucks, Netflix) spread a homogeneous global culture, sometimes:

Positive:

Breaking down barriers; easier communication; shared experiences.

Negative:

Erosion of local traditions, languages, and small local businesses.

4. Global Supply Chains

A single product (like a smartphone or t-shirt) may involve:

  • Cotton grown in one country
  • Fabric produced in another
  • Assembled in a third
  • Sold in dozens of others

This makes it harder to track who is responsible for exploitation or damage.

Ethical Issues Raised by Globalisation

1. Sweatshops: Exploitation or Opportunity?

Sweatshops:

Factories with low pay, long hours, poor safety, sometimes child labour.

Utilitarian Defence:

  • Workers choose these jobs because they are better than the alternatives (e.g. subsistence farming).
  • Sweatshops can be a stepping stone to development, as happened historically in South Korea and Taiwan.
  • If they raise overall utility (more jobs, cheaper goods), utilitarians might justify them.

Kantian Critique:

  • Using workers in unsafe sweatshops treats them merely as a means to profit, not as ends in themselves.
  • Violates human dignity and workers' rights, even if it brings some benefits.

Christian / Natural Law Critique:

  • Violates the duty to protect the vulnerable and respect human dignity.
  • Fails the idea of being good stewards of creation and caring for the poor.

2. Environmental Damage

Globalisation often leads to:

  • Higher CO₂ emissions from global shipping and aviation
  • Deforestation and pollution from resource extraction in poorer countries

Ethically:

  • Utilitarians balance economic benefits against long-term environmental harm.
  • Kantians stress duties to future generations and not using nature in a purely instrumental way.
  • Christian ethics emphasise stewardship and caring for creation.

3. Power and Inequality

Globalisation often shifts power from:

  • Local communities and governments
  • To multinational corporations and global markets

Ethical concerns:

  • Local people may have no voice in decisions that affect their land and livelihoods.
  • Neocolonialism: Economically powerful countries and companies dominate weaker nations, echoing old colonial patterns.

Ethical Theories Applied to Globalisation

Utilitarianism

Potential Support:

  • Cheaper goods benefit millions of consumers.
  • Jobs in developing countries can lift people out of extreme poverty.

Potential Criticism:

  • If exploitation causes huge amounts of hidden suffering, then the net happiness might be negative.
  • Utilitarians may underestimate long-term harms (climate change, cultural loss, inequality).

Kantian Ethics

Concerns:

  • Sweatshops and exploitative practices often use workers merely as means for profit, violating Kant's second formulation.
  • False advertising and opaque supply chains violate the duty of honesty and transparency.
  • Kantians might support globalisation only if it respects rights, autonomy, and fair treatment for all involved.

Scholarly Perspectives

A-level Summary

"Globalisation integrates world economies, laws and companies. This gives multinational corporations enormous power to move production to where labour is cheapest and laws are weakest. The result is that what is good for a business—cheap production and high profits—is not always good ethics, particularly when it comes to sweatshops, environmental damage and the erosion of local cultures."

A-level summary of business ethics and globalisation

This captures the tension between economic benefits and ethical costs arising from globalisation.

Academic Discussion

"Globalisation has fundamentally reshaped the landscape of business ethics. It has expanded the scope of corporate responsibility, demanding greater transparency, accountability and sensitivity to cultural diversity. Businesses can no longer afford to operate with narrow or outdated ethical frameworks. Instead, they must adopt inclusive, globally relevant standards that promote fairness, sustainability and the social wellbeing of people."

Academic discussion of the ethics of globalisation

This quote emphasises that globalisation forces companies to rethink ethics at a global scale, not just a local or national one.

Key Takeaways

Globalisation = Interconnected World

Goods, people, money, and data move easily across borders, integrating economies and cultures.

Creates Jobs and Growth, But Also Exploitation

Investment in developing countries can lift people out of poverty, but sweatshops and environmental harm are major concerns.

Utilitarian Perspective

Might defend sweatshops if they raise total happiness, but risk underestimating hidden suffering and long-term harms.

Kantian Critique

Criticise globalisation when it treats people as tools, not as ends in themselves, violating human dignity and rights.

Global Ethics Required

Companies are expected to uphold decent labour, environmental and human rights standards wherever they operate.

Quick Reference: Pros and Cons of Globalisation

Potential Ethical BenefitsPotential Ethical Harms
Jobs and investment in developing countriesSweatshops and worker exploitation
Cheaper goods for consumers worldwideEnvironmental damage and resource depletion
Cultural exchange and global communicationLoss of local cultures and small businesses
Pressure on companies to follow global ethical standards (e.g. UN Global Compact, fair trade)Power imbalance: MNCs can override local communities and governments