
Aristotle believed that to truly understand anything, you need to answer four questions: What is it made of? What is its form or design? What brought it into being? And what is its purpose? These are called the Four Causes: Material, Formal, Efficient, and Final. The Final Cause (purpose) is the most important because it explains why something exists in the first place. This framework became crucial for philosophical arguments about God as the ultimate Final Cause.
Let's use a wooden table as an example:
What is it made of?
The substance or matter that composes the thing. For a table: wood. For a statue: marble or bronze. For a human: flesh, blood, bones.
What is its form, pattern, or structure?
The design, blueprint, or essential characteristics. For a table: the specific shape and design that makes it a table (flat surface, legs, etc.). The formal cause is what makes a thing the kind of thing it is.
What brought it into existence?
The agent or process that made it happen. For a table: the carpenter who built it. For a child: the parents. For motion: the force that caused it. This is closest to what modern science means by "cause."
What is its purpose or goal?
The end, aim, or function for which it exists. For a table: to provide a surface for eating, working, etc. For an acorn: to become an oak tree. For eyes: to see. This is the most important cause for Aristotle.
| Example | Material | Formal | Efficient | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Statue | Bronze/marble | Shape of a person | Sculptor | To honor someone |
| House | Bricks, wood | Architectural design | Builder | Shelter for living |
| Human | Flesh, bone | Human form/soul | Parents | To reason and flourish |
| Acorn | Plant matter | Seed structure | Oak tree | To become an oak tree |
For Aristotle, you can't fully understand something until you know its purpose. The Final Cause explains WHY the thing exists and what it's meant to become. This is especially important for living things and natural processes, where purpose is built into their very nature.
Modern science focuses only on Material and Efficient causes (what things are made of and what physical processes cause them). Science doesn't ask "why" in terms of purpose—just "how" in terms of mechanism. This is why Aristotle's teleology fell out of favor in physics and biology after the Scientific Revolution.
The Four Causes became central to arguments for God's existence:
"The necessity condition: an explanation is adequate only if it correctly cites each of the four causes; any account which omits a cause where one is available is incomplete and so inadequate. The sufficiency condition: once an explanation has cited each of the four causes, it has left nothing out, and so is complete and adequate as an objective explanation."
Source: Christopher Shields (Professor of Philosophy, University of Notre Dame; previously Oxford University), referenced in "Aristotle's Four Causes | Definition, Examples & Analysis" (2014)
Note: Shields is also the editor of The Oxford Handbook of Aristotle and author of Aristotle (2014)
Why this works for A level:
This quote brilliantly captures the completeness and comprehensiveness of Aristotle's four-cause framework. It establishes two crucial points: (1) all four causes are necessary for adequate explanation—leaving any out renders the explanation incomplete, and (2) the four causes are sufficient—once all are identified, nothing more is needed. This shows sophisticated understanding of why Aristotle insisted on four distinct types of causes rather than reducing them to one or two, distinguishing him from his predecessors who "lacked a complete understanding of the range of possible causes and their systematic interrelations".
"Aristotle developed a theory of causality which is commonly known as the doctrine of the four causes. For Aristotle, a firm grasp of what a cause is, and how many kinds of causes there are, is essential for a successful investigation of the world around us... Aristotle's considered view is that there are four primary and irreducible kinds of causes: material, formal, efficient, and final cause."
Source: Andrea Falcon (Professor of Philosophy, Concordia University, Montreal), "Aristotle on Causality" in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
First Published: January 11, 2006 | Substantive Revision: March 7, 2023
Why this works for A level:
Falcon emphasizes that understanding causality is not just an abstract philosophical exercise but is "essential for a successful investigation of the world around us." This connects Aristotle's metaphysics directly to his scientific method and natural philosophy. The key term "irreducible" is important: none of the four causes can be collapsed into the others or explained away—each represents a fundamentally different type of explanation. This challenges students to think about why modern science's focus on only material and efficient causes might be incomplete from an Aristotelian perspective.